Clivia

**Results**

 * **Flower number** || **Shape** || **Colour** || **Length (mm)** || **Width (mm**) || **Stigma/Anther distance (mm)** || **Tube present**? || **Tube length** ||
 * 1 || Conical || Centre is white, gradient to bright orange || 73 || 62 || 13.75 || No || N/A ||
 * 2 || Conical || Centre is white, gradient to bright orange || 76 || 64 || 12.03 || No || N/A ||
 * 3 || Conical || Centre is white, gradient to bright orange || 80 || 70 || 8.96 || No || N/A ||
 * 4 || Conical || Centre is white, gradient to bright orange || 75 || 71 || 13.03 || No || N/A ||
 * 5 || Conical || Centre is white, gradient to bright orange || 82 || 58 || 14.83 || No || N/A ||
 * 6 || Conical || Centre is white, gradient to bright orange || 75 || 66 || 9.00 || No || N/A ||
 * 7 || Conical || Centre is white, gradient to bright orange || 81 || 56 || 12.93 || No || N/A ||
 * 8 || Conical || Centre is white, gradient to bright orange || 82 || 64 || 13.75 || No || N/A ||
 * Average || - ||  || 78 || 63.88 || 12.29 || - || - ||
 * Standard Deviation || - || - || 3.63 || 5.25 || 2.19 || - || - ||

**Brief discussion**
====From the data collected it can be seen that there are no strong variations in size of //C. miniata// (i.e. measurements are fairly consistent). This could possibly be due to the fact that the flowers replicates have been obtained from the same bunch/stem, thus, maturation has maintained at a same level.====

//Figure 4. Stained pollen grains of C. miniata Figure 5. Unstained pollen grains of C. miniata//
